Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the marginal adaptation of me
tal-ceramic crowns made with 3 different metal substructures. Materials and
Methods: Seventy-five gypsum dies were fabricated from a master steel die.
They were randomly divided into 3 groups of 25 dies each. A metal coping w
as prepared on each die using a different technique for each group: composi
te alloy, electroforming, and cast high-noble alloy. Ceramic was baked on a
ll of the samples following the same protocol and simulating the shape and
size of a maxillary central incisor. All specimens were evaluated under a s
tereomicroscope at 200X magnification. The marginal gap was measured at 8 d
ifferent points on each specimen before and after ceramic application and a
lso on the master steel die. A total of 3,600 measurements was evaluated. T
he results were statistically elaborated by means of a t test and one-way a
nalysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The ANOVA revealed a significant diff
erence in mean marginal gap before and after ceramic application within eac
h group. Electroforming (mean 32 mu m) and high-noble alloy (mean 31 mu m)
showed better marginal fit after ceramic application and on the master stee
l die compared to composite alloy (mean 68 mu m; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: M
arginal gaps are influenced by the application of ceramic and by the alloy
used for the substructure, and the values obtained were within the limits o
f clinical acceptability (70 mu m).