Purpose: The study compared the probablity of fracture of 4 systems of all-
ceramic crowns fabricated on maxillary central incisors. Materials and Meth
ods: The 4 all-ceramic crown systems were: (1) a glass-infiltrated, sintere
d alumina system (In-Ceram) fabricated conventionally, (2) the same system
with machine-milled alumina cores (CEREC 2), (3) a heat-press, leucite-rein
forced glass-ceramic system (IPS Empress), and (4) a high-purity, high-dens
ity alumina system (Procera). Ten crowns of each system were fabricated and
compressed at 45 degrees at the palatal surface until failure. The data we
re analyzed with the Weibull method. Results: There were no significant dif
ferences in the probability of fracture among the 4 systems studied. Conclu
sion: The likelihood of fracture of these crown systems on central incisors
should be similar.