Rk. Khandker et al., A decision model and cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance guidelines for average-risk adults, INT J TE A, 16(3), 2000, pp. 799-810
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
Objectives: Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in
people at average risk and at increased risk have recently been published b
y the American Gastroenterological Association. The guidelines for the popu
lation at average risk were evaluated using cost-effectiveness analyses.
Methods: Since colorectal cancers primarily arise from precancerous adenoma
s, a state transition model of disease progression from adenomatous polyps
was developed. Rather than assuming that polyps turn to cancer after a fixe
d interval (dwell time), such transitions were modeled to occur as an expon
ential function of the age of the polyps. Screening strategies included per
iodic fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast bari
um enema, and colonoscopy. Screening costs in 1994 dollars were estimated u
sing Medicare and private claims data, and clinical parameters were based u
pon published studies.
Results: Cost per life-year saved was $12,636 for flexible sigmoidoscopy ev
ery 5 years and $14,394 for annual fecal occult blood testing. The assumpti
on made for polyp dwell time critically affected the attractiveness of alte
rnative screening strategies.
Conclusions: Sigmoidoscopy every 5 years and annual fecal blood testing wer
e the two most cost-effective strategies, but with low compliance, occult b
lood testing was less cost-effective. Lowering colonoscopy costs greatly im
proved the cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy every 10 years.