M. Bradney et al., Heterogeneity in the growth of the axial and appendicular skeleton in boys: Implications for the pathogenesis of bone fragility in men, J BONE MIN, 15(10), 2000, pp. 1871-1878
Men with spine fractures have reduced vertebral body (VB) volume and volume
tric bone mineral density (vBMD). Men with hip fractures have reduced femor
al neck (FN) volume and vBMD, site-specific deficits that may have their or
igins in growth. To describe the tempo of growth in regional bone size, bon
e mineral content (BMC), and vBMD, we measured bone length, periosteal acid
endocortical diameters, BMC, and vBMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiomet
ry in 184 boys aged between 7 and 17 years. Before puberty, growth was more
rapid in the legs than in the trunk. During puberty, leg growth slowed whi
le trunk length accelerated. Bone size was more advanced than BMC in all re
gions, being similar to 70% and similar to 35% of their predicted peaks at
7 years of age, respectively. At 16 years of age, bone size had reached its
adult peak while BMC was still 10% below its predicted peak. The legs acco
unted for 48%, whereas the spine accounted for 10%, of the 1878 g BMC accru
ed between 7 and 17 years. Peripubertal growth contributed (i) 55% of the i
ncrease in leg length but 78% of the mineral accrued and (ii) 69% of the in
crease in spine length but 87% of the mineral accrued. Increased metacarpal
and midfemoral cortical thickness was caused by respective periosteal expa
nsion with minimal change in the endocortical diameter. Total femur and VB
vBMD increased by 30-40% while size and BMC increased by 200-300%. Thus, gr
owth builds a bigger but only slightly denser skeleton. We speculate that e
ffect of disease or a risk factor during growth depends on the regions matu
rational stage at the time of exposure. The earlier growth of a regions siz
e than mass, and the differing growth patterns from region to region, predi
spose to site-specific deficits in bone size, vBMD, or both. Regions furthe
r from their peak may be more severely affected by illness than those neare
r completion of growth. Bone fragility in old age is likely to have its fou
ndations partly established during growth.