Antibody responses against Porphyromonas gingivalis infection in patients with early-onset periodontitis

Citation
Sj. Guo et al., Antibody responses against Porphyromonas gingivalis infection in patients with early-onset periodontitis, J CLIN PER, 27(10), 2000, pp. 769-777
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
03036979 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
769 - 777
Database
ISI
SICI code
0303-6979(200010)27:10<769:ARAPGI>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Background, aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate antibody responses against Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) infection in early-onset p eriodontitis (EOP) patients to elucidate further the host-parasite interact ions in the pathogenesis of EOP. Method: 16 P. gingivalis-infected EOP and 20 adult periodontitis (AP) patie nts, and 18 periodontally healthy subjects (HS) participated in this study. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels and avidities against extract ed P. gingivalis whole cells were measured. The components of P. gingivalis outer membrane antigens (OMA) reacting to patients' sera were analysed fro m the molecular weights by Western blotting. Serum antibody levels against P. gingivalis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were also measured. The ability of t he patients' sera to block interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) production by hum an mononuclear cells in response to P. gingivalis LPS was examined. Results: Antibody levels were positively correlated with antibody avidities in both EOP and AP patients (r=0.91, r=0.72, p<0.0005, respectively), whil e not significantly so in HS (r=0.09). There was variability in the antigen recognition of P. gingivalis OMA in EOP and AP patients. Smear and 53-kDa protein were more frequently recognized by sera of EOP and AP patients rath er than that of HS (p<0.05). The smear was partly diminished by absorption with P. gingivalis LPS, indicating the smear antigen was partly composed of LPS. There was high correlation between antibody levels against P. gingiva lis whole-cell extracts and LPS in EOP and AP patients (r=0.81, p=0.0002, r =0.87, p<0.0001, respectively), while not significant in HS (r=0.22). The s era of EOP and AP patients with high IgG titre to P. gingivalis LPS blocked IL-1 beta production more effectively than that of the patients with low I gG titre to P. gingivalis LPS. Conclusions: These results indicate that EOP patients' antibody response ag ainst P. gingivalis infection does not differ significantly from that of AP patients. The person-to-person heterogeneous antibody production against P . gingivalis LPS could contribute to our understanding of the relationship between the defensive ability of EOP patients and their chronic infection w ith this pathogen.