This paper shows that altruistic parents with utilitarian preferences may f
are better if they transfer resources to their children early in life inste
ad of delaying the bulk of transfers until after their death. Moreover, the
outcome of the analysed "family transfer game" is not Pareto-efficient in
the case of bequests. However, if altruistic parents hold. Rawlsian prefere
nces, they will be indifferent between gifts and bequests, and Pareto-effic
iency is always obtained. In intermediate cases of Atkinson-type welfare fu
nctions, welfare losses of bequests compared to gifts disappear as the aver
sion to inequality converges to infinity. JEL classification: D61, D64, J22
.