Genetic relatedness is a central concept in the study of social evolution.
Though originally defined in terms of genealogy, the modern version of rela
tedness accommodates genetic similarity of any origin. This paper examines
relatedness in group structured modes, in which a trait affects the fitness
of all group members. Such traits can be divided into two types, based on
whether their group fitness effects encompass all group members including t
he actor ("whole-group traits"), or only group members other than the actor
("other-only traits"). Both trait types are common in nature as well as in
theoretical models, but they have rarely been distinguished clearly. The a
verage relatedness of recipients to actors differs for the two trait types
within the same population and even the same individual, leading to differe
nt selection pressures and evolutionary outcomes. Total relatedness in grou
p-structured models can be partitioned into two components: structural rela
tedness due to the size and number of groups in the population, and assorta
tive relatedness due to the distribution of genotypes among groups. Each co
mponent differs for whole-group vs. other-only traits, both in terms of the
ir values and the factors that influence them. Some key differences include
: positive relatedness requires positive assortment for other-only but not
for whole-group traits; negative relatedness is possible for other-only but
not whole-group traits; relatedness depends on average group size for whol
e-group but not other-only traits, and non-random assortment into groups af
fects relatedness more strongly for other-only than whole-group traits. Rec
ognizing the distinction between these trait types resolves some apparent c
ontradictions in the literature, and clarifies the limits of some previous
results. (C) 2000 Academic Press.