This paper describes the formulation and the application of the nonhydrosta
tic anelastic vorticity model (TVM). This model is constructed using a meth
od involving two horizontal streamfunctions and two horizontal vorticity co
mponents. The evaluation of this formulation is performed by simulating var
ious bidimensional hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic mountain wave cases. Resu
lts are compared with analytical solutions and in particular with those dev
eloped by Laprise and Peltier for nonlinear forcings. The anelastic formula
tion is also validated with respect to the highly nonlinear 1972 Boulder wi
ndstorm. TVM is shown to accurately reproduce these mountain wave test case
s in both its incompressible and anelastic formulations.
In the second part of this paper, the adequacy of the hydrostatic and anela
stic assumptions in simulating thermally induced circulations is investigat
ed and compared to previous works. For a moderate surface thermal forcing,
typical geographical setups are used and show slight differences between hy
drostatic and nonhydrostatic horizontal wind speeds. For vertical wind spee
ds, differences are shown to be much larger and more sensitive to changes i
n grid resolution. For more stringent thermal surface forcing, differences
remain low for horizontal wind speeds bur increase considerably for the ver
tical wind component.
The comparison between anelastic and incompressible solutions For the same
cases shows the adequacy of the incompressible assumption when circulations
are forced by the surface and are characterized by a relatively shallow ve
rtical extent. In such conditions, virtually no differences are observed be
tween the two formulations.