Re. Domen et Ka. Nelson, RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF INFECTIOUS-DISEASE TESTING PRACTICES BY ORGAN PROCUREMENT ORGANIZATIONS IN THE UNITED-STATES, Transplantation, 63(12), 1997, pp. 1790-1794
Background. Information related to infectious disease testing policies
and practices of organ procurement organizations in the United States
does not currently exist. Methods. A total of 63 organ procurement or
ganizations in the United States were surveyed during May 1996. Partic
ipants responded to a detailed questionnaire concerning infectious dis
ease tests performed for tissue and solid organ donors and policies re
lated to the reporting and notification of positive test results. Resu
lts. The response rate was 77.8%. The majority of testing is performed
by hospital laboratories with an expected turnaround time of 5 hr or
less by 71% of organ procurement organizations. Almost all routinely p
erform screening tests for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C v
irus, cytomegalovirus, syphilis, human T lymphocyte virus I, and hepat
itis B surface antigen. Other tests are performed with greater variabi
lity. Although the majority of organ procurement organizations perform
confirmatory tests when screening tests are positive, 35% do not perf
orm confirmatory testing or do so only sporadically, There are a wide
range of policies concerning the subsequent reporting of positive infe
ctious disease tests and to whom results should be reported. Conclusio
ns. Infectious disease testing policies of organ procurement organizat
ions, particularly for solid organs, demonstrate variability in interp
retation and perceived significance of positive test results, the init
iation or need for reflex and confirmatory testing, the reporting of p
ositive results, and to whom positive test results should be reported.
There is a need for a consistent national policy for appropriate infe
ctious disease testing and reporting of results.