Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests

Citation
J. Murlis et al., Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests, PHYSL ENTOM, 25(3), 2000, pp. 211-222
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
ISSN journal
03076962 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
211 - 222
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-6962(200009)25:3<211:SATSOP>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Wind-borne odour stimuli from a small point-source of pheromone are intermi ttent owing to the effects of atmospheric turbulence on the odour plume. Th e work reported here measures the characteristics of the intermittent stimu lus in open fields and forests during typical daytime atmospheric condition s. To model the pheromone plume, negatively charged atmospheric ions were u sed as a tracer. They were released from an ion generator, and ion detector s measured the fluctuating flux of ions at positions up to 20 m downwind in the open field case and 10 m in the forest. In both the open field and in the forest, ion signals were highly intermittent, with a signal present onl y 20% of the time. Ion signals recorded in the forest consisted of bursts w ith gaps between them of at least three-fold greater duration than those fr om the open field. In both environments, bursts generally each comprised a series of 'spikes', on average three in the field and seven in the forest. To validate the use of ionized air plumes as models of pheromone plumes, th e antennae of male Lymantria dispar (gypsy moth) were used as detectors to quantify the plume of synthetic (+)-disparlure emanating from a 2000 ng poi nt source placed approximate to 10 cm from the ion source. A comparison of ion signals and EAGs (electronantennograms) suggests that the antennae resp ond to the main spikes within a burst, but no consistent relationship betwe en the strength of the spikes and the magnitude of the EAG response was fou nd. The average strengths of bursts in the ion detector signal decreased sy stematically as the distance from the ion generator to the ion detector inc reased. A similar trend, however, was not detected in the EAG response.