Across-meal variety was operationally defined as the varying of a midday me
al, whereas monotony was defined as serving the same midday meal for 5 days
. Acceptance and intake of the meal declined in the monotony week and did n
ot decline in the variety week. Acceptance levels decreased but remained hi
gh, demonstrating that monotony can occur with acceptable foods. Intake inc
reased on the final day of testing under the variety condition. The potato
product was resistant to monotony for both acceptance and intake, as has be
en shown for other staple foods. Green beans were sensitive to monotony. Co
rrelations between acceptance and intake were highly significant; they were
moderate in the variety condition (averaging r = 0.5) and lower in the mon
otony condition, suggesting how variety impacts normal varied eating. (C) 2
000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.