Confirmatory factor analyses with the standardization data of the Wechsler
Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition(Wechsler, 1997a) compared 6 models w
ith 1 to 4 factors for 11- and 13-subtest versions of the test. Three facto
rs usually fit the data better than 2 factors, but 2-factor models were mor
e parsimonious. A 2-factor model with a Verbal Comprehension factor (Vocabu
lary, Similarities, Information, and Comprehension) was as good as and some
times better than the 2-factor model defined by the traditional separation
of Verbal and Performance subtests. For 3-factor models, alternative specif
ications of processing speed subtests on either the Perceptual Organization
or Freedom From Distractibility factor were comparable, and specifying a 4
th factor for Digit Symbol and Symbol Search bad little advantage in compar
ison with 3-factor models with correlated errors for the 2 subtests.