HEMODYNAMIC EVALUATION OF THE ADDITION OF ISOSORBIDE-5-MONONITRATE TONADOLOL IN CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS WITH INSUFFICIENT RESPONSE TO THE BETA-BLOCKER ALONE
C. Merkel et al., HEMODYNAMIC EVALUATION OF THE ADDITION OF ISOSORBIDE-5-MONONITRATE TONADOLOL IN CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS WITH INSUFFICIENT RESPONSE TO THE BETA-BLOCKER ALONE, Hepatology, 26(1), 1997, pp. 34-39
The association beta-blockers plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (15M) has
been proposed for the treatment of portal hypertension in patients wit
h insufficient response to beta-blockers alone, according to hemodynam
ic criteria, The mechanism of action in these patients is not clearly
defined, Fifteen patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices were e
valuated by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement and du
plex-Doppler ultrasonography before and after 1 month of treatment wit
h nadolol, Nine patients who did not exhibit a decrease in HVPG to 12
mm Hg or a percent decrease greater than 20% were classified as poor r
esponders, and were studied again with the same methodology after 3 mo
nths of chronic administration of nadolol + 15M 20 mg twice per day, I
n poor responders, mean HVPG decrease after nadolol was 8.9% +/- 2.8%,
and after the combination, it was 25.7% +/- 1.7% (P =.004). All patie
nts except one became good responders to the association. Portal blood
flow (PBF) decreased significantly after nadolol (P =.004), and remai
ned unchanged after the addition of nitrates. Resistance to portal blo
od flow (RPBF) increased after nadolol (P =.02) and returned to baseli
ne values during combined treatment (P = .03). In good responders, an
adequate decrease in HVPG was associated with a decrease in PBF (P =.0
6) but no change in RPBF, A wide spectrum of combined changes in PBF a
nd in RPBF after nadolol was observed in poor responders, ranging from
no change in either parameter to a marked decrease in PBF counterbala
nced by a marked increase in RPBF. The addition of 15M was followed in
most cases by larger effects on resistance than on flow, Doppler para
meters were not significantly correlated with the HVPG response to nad
olol alone or associated with 15M. It is concluded that good hemodynam
ic responders to nadolol differ from poor responders in the lack of in
crease in RPBF after the drug. The addition of nitrates to nadolol is
effective in decreasing portal pressure in most poor responders to nad
olol alone. A decrease in outflow resistance is the main mechanism inv
olved.