Continuing reluctance to use single fractions of radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: an Australian and New Zealand practice survey and literature review
De. Roos, Continuing reluctance to use single fractions of radiotherapy for metastatic bone pain: an Australian and New Zealand practice survey and literature review, RADIOTH ONC, 56(3), 2000, pp. 315-322
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Purpose: To survey Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) radiation oncologists o
n their preferred fractionation regimens for pain due to bone metastases in
the context of similar overseas surveys and the large body of evidence fro
m randomized trials.
Methods: Delegates to the October 1998 Royal ANZ College of Radiologists An
nual Scientific Meeting were asked to state their fractionation for four hy
pothetical cases viz. local bone pain from metastatic breast, prostate and
lung cancer and neuropathic (radicular)pain from metastatic lung cancer. In
addition to demographic data, respondents were asked to select reasons for
their choices and indicate what factors would influence a change in their
recommended fractionation.
Results: Twelve of 32 trainees and 41 of 82 specialists completed the surve
y, giving an overall response rate of 46%. There was decreasing use of shor
ter fractionation schedules from lung through prostate to breast cancer wit
h, in particular, single fractions recommended by, respectively, 42 28 and
15% of respondents for local bone pain (P = 0.013). However, the presence o
f neuropathic pain from metastatic lung cancer led to lower use of single f
ractions (15%, P = 0.0046). There were no statistically significant differe
nces in preferred fractionation with respect to other variables assessed in
this survey. The commonest reasons cited for fractionating were desire to
minimize recurrent pain and the influence of training, with desire to minim
ize the risk of neurological progression and optimize tumour regression als
o important for neuropathic pain. By contrast, use of single fractions was
most commonly based upon literature results and patient convenience. Changi
ng from multiple to single fractions was most influenced by poor performanc
e status, while the presence of neurological signs/symptoms had the reverse
effect.
Conclusions: The findings from this ANZ survey largely reflect the results
from other surveys performed in the UK, Europe, Canada and USA. Although de
bate continues in the literature, the continuing preference of radiation on
cologists to fractionate for local bone pain is contrary to the 16 randomiz
ed trials published to date which give little support for a dose-response r
elationship above a single 6-8 Gy in this setting. This practice has signif
icant implications for departmental workload, costs to the healthcare syste
m and patient convenience. There is no objective evidence on the influence
of fractionation for neuropathic bone pain in the literature at present, al
though an ANZ randomized trial addressing this problem is under way (TROG 9
6.05). (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.