Findings in economic theory suggest that horizontal mergers involving firms
with aggregate market share less than 50% are unlikely to be motivated by
the consequent reduction in competitivity. The results arise because, absen
t cost efficiencies, quantity-setting firms in small mergers are impoverish
ed by the merger. We demonstrate that this conclusion is a consequence of t
he strong restrictions imposed on the demand function, and we identify a we
ll-behaved demand function such that any set of merging firms benefits from
the reduction in competition even when there are no cost efficiencies.