Comparative efficacy of different low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and drug interactions with LMWH: Implications for management of vascular disorders
Sa. Mousa, Comparative efficacy of different low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and drug interactions with LMWH: Implications for management of vascular disorders, SEM THROMB, 26, 2000, pp. 39-46
The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are more efficacious and safer th
an unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the prevention and treatment of venous t
hrombosis and to a certain extent in the treatment of acute ischemic syndro
mes. Because of their predictable pharmacokinetics and bioavailability afte
r subcutaneous administration, LMWHs can be more convenient for outpatient
use than UFH. Differences in the manufacturing process of LMWHs result in s
ignificant structural and molecular weight differences; thus, LMWHs have in
dividual biochemical and pharmacological profiles and are not interchangeab
le on the basis of either mass or anti-Xa activity. Using thromboelastograp
h (TEG) and platelet aggregometry, this investigation compared the in vitro
efficacy among various LMWHs and examined the interactions between LMWHs a
nd platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists. TEG was used to determi
ne the ability of platelet and fibrin interactions to augment blood clots,
an effect measured under conditions of maximal platelet activation during c
lot formation accelerated by recombinant human tissue factor (TF). The comp
arative efficacy of LMWHs on different mediator-induced clot retraction in
human blood was assessed by TEG, which demonstrated the potency of differen
t LMWHs to inhibit various mediator-induced clot formations under shear. Ti
nzaparin was relatively more effective in inhibiting TF-, lipopolysaccharid
e-, factor (f) Xa-, and thrombin-induced clot formation under shear. Under
these conditions, platelets significantly enhance clot strength (eightfold
vs. platelet-free fibrin clots). LMWHs appear to have broader efficacy than
other anticoagulants. Abciximab and roxifiban further inhibited clot stren
gth by affecting the transmission of platelet contractile force to fibrin b
y platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptors. Subtherapeutic doses of tinzaparin combine
d with abciximab or roxifiban resulted in a distinct synergy that improved
anticoagulant and antiplatelet efficacy mediated by TF, fXa, or thrombin. A
s these data suggest, the combination of low-dose tinzaparin with low-dose
GPIIb/IIIa antagonists (abciximab, roxifiban) may be efficacious in the pre
vention and treatment of various thromboembolic disorders.