Psychometric properties of the schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCBN-2.1)

Citation
Cat. Rijnders et al., Psychometric properties of the schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCBN-2.1), SOC PSY PSY, 35(8), 2000, pp. 348-352
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
Journal title
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
09337954 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
348 - 352
Database
ISI
SICI code
0933-7954(200008)35:8<348:PPOTSF>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Background: The Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) , the successor of the ninth version of the Present State Examination (PSE- 9), is one of the latest instruments developed by the World Health Organisa tion for the assessment of psychiatric disorders. So far, the psychometric properties have only been established for certain sections of the instrumen t. The present study is the first to test the psychometric properties of SC AN-2.1 for most of the disorders covered by the SCAN, and was carried out p rior to a survey conducted in the Nijmegen Health Area (the Netherlands). M ethods: Interviewers were psychology graduates with little clinical experie nce. Two designs were used. In one design, pairs of independent live interv iews with the same respondent were compared (test-retest situation). In the other, ten videotaped interviews by experts were rated by each of the inte rviewers (standardized situation), and the outcomes were compared with thos e of the other interviewers as well as with a reference score. Results: In the test-retest situation the re coefficient for diagnostic caseness was qu alified as substantial (0.62) and for diagnostic categories and diagnostic groups as moderate to good (0.24 to 0.64). In the standardized situation us ing videotaped interviews by experts, sensitivity as well as specificity pr oved to be substantial to almost perfect. The agreement per interviewer wit h regard to the reference diagnoses ranged from 87% (diagnostic group) to 9 4% (diagnostic caseness). Agreement on the syndrome level (without duration and interference criteria of DSM-IV) was excellent. Conclusions: Although the instrument is traditionally used by experienced clinicians, this study shows that less experienced (but well trained) interviewers can apply SCAN reliably. Special attention should be paid to the items without explicit in terview questions, as they tend to be more sensitive to neglect than the it ems with interview questions.