Cat. Rijnders et al., Psychometric properties of the schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCBN-2.1), SOC PSY PSY, 35(8), 2000, pp. 348-352
Background: The Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN)
, the successor of the ninth version of the Present State Examination (PSE-
9), is one of the latest instruments developed by the World Health Organisa
tion for the assessment of psychiatric disorders. So far, the psychometric
properties have only been established for certain sections of the instrumen
t. The present study is the first to test the psychometric properties of SC
AN-2.1 for most of the disorders covered by the SCAN, and was carried out p
rior to a survey conducted in the Nijmegen Health Area (the Netherlands). M
ethods: Interviewers were psychology graduates with little clinical experie
nce. Two designs were used. In one design, pairs of independent live interv
iews with the same respondent were compared (test-retest situation). In the
other, ten videotaped interviews by experts were rated by each of the inte
rviewers (standardized situation), and the outcomes were compared with thos
e of the other interviewers as well as with a reference score. Results: In
the test-retest situation the re coefficient for diagnostic caseness was qu
alified as substantial (0.62) and for diagnostic categories and diagnostic
groups as moderate to good (0.24 to 0.64). In the standardized situation us
ing videotaped interviews by experts, sensitivity as well as specificity pr
oved to be substantial to almost perfect. The agreement per interviewer wit
h regard to the reference diagnoses ranged from 87% (diagnostic group) to 9
4% (diagnostic caseness). Agreement on the syndrome level (without duration
and interference criteria of DSM-IV) was excellent. Conclusions: Although
the instrument is traditionally used by experienced clinicians, this study
shows that less experienced (but well trained) interviewers can apply SCAN
reliably. Special attention should be paid to the items without explicit in
terview questions, as they tend to be more sensitive to neglect than the it
ems with interview questions.