Optimum soil water for soil respiration before and after amendment with glucose in humid tropical acrisols and a boreal mor layer

Citation
U. Ilstedt et al., Optimum soil water for soil respiration before and after amendment with glucose in humid tropical acrisols and a boreal mor layer, SOIL BIOL B, 32(11-12), 2000, pp. 1591-1599
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00380717 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
11-12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1591 - 1599
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-0717(200010)32:11-12<1591:OSWFSR>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The measurements of water content most often used by soil microbiologists a re gravimetric water content (W-g), volumetric water content (W-v), percent age of water holding capacity (%WHC), percentage of water filled porosity ( %WFP), and water potential (W-p). This study investigated the relationship of these water measurements to soil respiration, before and after substrate addition (glucose, nitrogen and phosphorus), focusing on the water content s at which the exponential respiration rates after amendments (mu) were at their maximum. Three tropical Haplic Acrisols and one boreal mor layer were used. One Acrisol had high loss of ignition (LOI 17.4% w/w) and high clay content. The second Acrisol had high clay content and low LOI (3.9%), and t he third had low clay content and low LOI (5.7%). The mor layer had a LOI o f 95.6%. The maximum mu was found at -15 kPa, (50% WHC), irrespectively of the soil type. The decrease in mu above -15 kPa was not as pronounced for t he Swedish mor layer as for the Acrisols. At water potentials above -2 kPa the respiration rate was no longer exponential for the Acrisols, making it impossible to define mu. For W-g, WFP, and W-v the maximum differed greatly between the soils. The maximum for basal respiration was found to be at hi gher water content than the maximum for mu. However, the water contents use d were not high enough to specify optimum water content for basal respirati on except for the humus rich Acrisol which was at 66% of the WHC or about - 5 kPa. It is suggested that respiration measurements of the Acrisols, after substrate addition, should not be made using water contents exceeding -15 kPa or 50% WHC. Because of the dependency of method, WHC must be defined an d complemented by water potential. The use of WFP, W-v, and W-g is not reco mmended for adjusting the water contents of these soils. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.