Robert Rosen: The well-posed question and its answer - Why are organisms different from machines?

Authors
Citation
Dc. Mikulecky, Robert Rosen: The well-posed question and its answer - Why are organisms different from machines?, SYST RES BE, 17(5), 2000, pp. 419-432
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Management
Journal title
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
10927026 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
419 - 432
Database
ISI
SICI code
1092-7026(200009/10)17:5<419:RRTWQA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The question 'What is life?' has been asked by many over the years. Robert Rosen realized that this was a poorly posed question and that when rephrase d the question had an earthshaking answer. This is the subject of this revi ew. We will examine the entire epistemological basis for modern science and its grounding in reductionism and the machine metaphor. The role of the ma chine metaphor in science goes back to Descartes. Newton and those who foll owed built it into what has become modern science. The success of this worl dview was so great that it became as strong as any of the other belief stru ctures we might identify as religions. Physics is said to deal with the fundamental laws of nature. Chemistry and biology were to use these laws to deal with specific applications of the ge neral laws of physics. This world of the machine is a 'simple' world inhabi ted by simple machines or mechanisms. What if the objects in chemistry and biology are not that simple? Then we must reduce them to subunits that are. Robert Rosen discovered that when the reduction is performed something rea l and necessary is lost in a way that made it unrecoverable. It isn't the a toms and molecules that are at the hard core of reality, it is the relation s between them and the relations between them and things called processes w hich are at the core of the real world. From this perspective the answer is a very easy one to obtain. When the causal relations are examined, the org anism stands apart from the machine by being closed to efficient cause. It is its own 'builder'. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.