Quantitative genetics of bud phenology, frost damage, and winter survival in an F-2 family of hybrid poplars

Citation
Gt. Howe et al., Quantitative genetics of bud phenology, frost damage, and winter survival in an F-2 family of hybrid poplars, THEOR A GEN, 101(4), 2000, pp. 632-642
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences","Animal & Plant Sciences
Journal title
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
ISSN journal
00405752 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
632 - 642
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-5752(200009)101:4<632:QGOBPF>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
We studied the quantitative genetics of bud phenology, fall frost damage, a nd winter survival in an F-2 family (no. 822) of Populus hybrids derived fr om a cross between two full-sub F-1 hybrids (P. trichocarpa (Torr. gr Grayx P. deltoides Bartr.). Field traits studied included the timing of bud set ( BSF) in Minnesota and Oregon, the timing of bud flush (BFF) in Oregon, as w ell as fall frost damage (FDF) and winter survival (WSF) in Minnesota. We c onclude that Family 822 has substantial genetic variability for all field t raits, BSF and BFF are under moderate to strong genetic control (H-i(2)=0.3 8-0.80), FDF and WSF are under low to moderate genetic control (H-i(2)=0.27 -0.40), and late bud set is associated with increased frost damage and decr eased winter survival. In a warm greenhouse, we measured the timing of bud set and the number of new leaves on trees growing under either an 8-h photo period (BSSD and NLSD) or a natural photoperiod (NP) from August to Decembe r (BSNP and NLNP). We found that BSSD, NLSD, and NLNP are under moderate ge netic control (H-i(2)=0.53-0.70), but the heritability of BSNP could not be determined because few trees set bud in the warm greenhouse under the NP. By comparing results from the greenhouse experiments with results from the field, we conclude that the genetic correlation between BSSD and BSF (0.53- 0.60) is relatively modest and that NPs in the fall are relatively ineffect ive at promoting bud set under warm greenhouse temperatures, although bud s et readily occurred in the field. Although, low levels of light pollution i n the greenhouse might have affected BSNP, results from both greenhouse and field experiments suggest that genetic differences in photoperiodic respon ses play a modest role in explaining genetic differences in the timing of b ud set under natural field conditions. Therefore, genetic differences in re sponses to other environmental factors, such as temperature, deserve greate r attention.