Endorectal ultrasonography and treatment of early stage rectal cancer

Citation
T. Akasu et al., Endorectal ultrasonography and treatment of early stage rectal cancer, WORLD J SUR, 24(9), 2000, pp. 1061-1068
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
03642313 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1061 - 1068
Database
ISI
SICI code
0364-2313(200009)24:9<1061:EUATOE>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative stag ing by endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) and its contribution to treatment o f early stage rectal cancer (ESRC). The results of EUS for 154 consecutive patients with ESRC (pTis to pT2) were compared prospectively with histologi c findings, assessed according to the TNM classification. Results of treatm ent selection and long-term outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. There w ere 35 patients histologically staged as pTis, 8 as pT1-slight (invasion co nfined to the superficial one-third of the submucosa), 37 as pT1-massive (i nvasion extending to the deeper submucosa), and 74 as pT2. The equipment us ed was an echoendoscope GF-UM2 or GF-UM3 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Sensitivi ty/specificity/ overall accuracy rates for detection of slight submucosal i nvasion, massive submucosal invasion, and muscularis propria invasion were 99%/ 74%/96%, 98%/88%/97%, and 97%/93%/96%, respectively. Incidences of lym ph node metastasis in pTis, pTis to pT1-slight, pT1, pT1-massive, and pT2 c ases were 0%, 0%, 18%, 22%, and 30%, respectively. Incidences of lymph node metastasis in ESRCs staged by EUS (u) as uTis, uT1-slight, uT1-massive, uT 2, and uT3 by EUS were 0%, 0%, 26%, 36%, and 64%, respectively. Sensitivity , specificity, and overall accuracy rates for detection of positive nodes i n overall ESRCs were 53%, 77%, and 72%, respectively. Of the 43 patients wi th pTis to pT1-slight tumors, 22 underwent endoscopic polypectomy or local excision, 20 radical surgery, and 1 radical surgery after endoscopic polype ctomy due to vascular invasion. All these patients are alive and all but on e (who refused radical surgery due to vascular invasion after local excisio n and developed liver and lung metastases) are disease-free, Of the 37 pati ents with pT1-massive tumors, 34 underwent radical surgery and 3 transcoccy geal segmental resection. All these patients are alive disease-free except for one who died of peritoneal carcinomatosis after radical surgery. All pa tients with pT2 tumors underwent radical surgery. The overall 5-year surviv al rates for pTis, pT1, and pT2 cases were 100%, 98%, and 97%, respectively . EUS is an accurate method for evaluating invasion depth in ESRC. Patients with uTis or uT1-slight tumors staged by EUS are at low risk of positive n odes and good candidates for endoscopic polypectomy or local excision. Thos e with uT1-massive or uT2 lesions should be treated with a radical operatio n because of the high incidence of positive nodes.