An efficacy and tolerance comparison of emedastine difumarate 0.05% and levocabastine hydrochloride 0.05%: Reducing chemosis and eyelid swelling in subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
A. Secchi et al., An efficacy and tolerance comparison of emedastine difumarate 0.05% and levocabastine hydrochloride 0.05%: Reducing chemosis and eyelid swelling in subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, ACT OPHTH S, 78, 2000, pp. 48-51
Purpose: To compare emedastine ophthalmic solution 0.05% BID to levocabasti
ne ophthalmic suspension 0.05% BID in reducing chemosis, eyelid swelling an
d other signs and symptoms in subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctiviti
s.
Methods: In a randomized, double-masked, parallel controlled study, emedast
ine ophthalmic solution 0.05% BID was compared to levocabastine ophthalmic
suspension 0.05% BID for control of chemosis, eyelid swelling and other par
ameters in the environmental allergy study model.
Results: At Days 7, 14, 30 and 42, emedastine was significantly better than
levocabastine at controlling chemosis and eyelid swelling (p<0.05), A stat
istical trend was seen at Day 3 (0.05<p<0.10), Results were clinically rele
vant at Days 30 and 42, Emedastine was also significantly better at reducin
g redness and itching at Days 7, 14, 30 and 42 (p<0.05),
Conclusion: Emedastine is more efficacious than levocabastine in reducing c
hemosis, eyelid swelling and other efficacy variables associated with seaso
nal allergic conjunctivitis.