Purpose: To evaluate skin tests with clinical ocular allergy and to compare
cutaneous hypersensitivity and seasonal allergic conjunctivitis in childre
n.
Case-report: A ill-year-old girl presented a typical seasonal allergic conj
unctivitis, never treated and the onset occurred one year before. She was s
kin tested for the allergy, Complete blood tests were also performed. An oc
ular treatment was given: olopatadine over 45 days.
Results: She showed a complete cutaneous anergy including histamine and cod
eine controls. Radioallergosorbent tests (RAST) found numerous great positi
vity to different allergens. Within 30 days under ocular treatment, she rec
overed completely from symptoms and clinical signs.
Conclusion: Clinical typical seasonal ocular allergy in children with cutan
eous anergy should be explored further or at least treated. Cutaneous hyper
sensitivity should be evaluated more precisely with a larger study comparin
g results in general allergy and in ocular allergy where the anergy seems t
o be more frequent.