From studies of "Silicon Valley effects" to regional economic development,
the spatial proximity of firms is shedding new light on some of the most en
during puzzles in business and economics. Yet few studies examine whether s
patial proximity leads individuals with shared interests to be more politic
ally active. We address this question by examining whether geographic conce
ntration makes individuals in industries exposed to international trade (i.
e., through export orientation or import competition) more likely to mobili
ze politically. Studying U.S. manufacturers in 1998 and 1990, we find that,
for trade-exposed industries, geographic concentration strongly increases
(a) the formation of common trade policy preferences among workers; (b) emp
loyees' contributions to political campaigns; and (c) voter turnout. This a
ctivism traces not to the behavior of political elites, but rather to the i
ncreased possibility for collective action that spatial proximity affords i
ndividuals in trade-exposed industries.