R. Stendel et al., Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography as a screening technique for detection of a patent foramen ovale before surgery in the sitting position, ANESTHESIOL, 93(4), 2000, pp. 971-975
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: Venous air embolism has been reported to occur in 23-45% of pat
ients undergoing neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position. If venou
s air embolism occurs, a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a risk factor for pa
radoxical air embolism and its sequelae. Preoperative screening for a PFO i
s therefore recommended by some investigators. The reference standard for i
dentifying a PFO is contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (c-T
EE), Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (c-TCD) and con
trast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) are noninvasive alter
native methods, but so far there are no studies as to their diagnostic vali
dity in neurosurgical patients.
Methods: The sensitivity and specificity of c-TCD and c-TTE in detecting a
PFO were determined in a prospective study using c-TEE as the reference sta
ndard. Preoperative c-TCD, c-TTE, and c-TEE studies were performed during t
he Valsalva maneuver after intravenous echo-contrast medium (D-Galactose, E
chovist-300, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was administered in 92 consecuti
ve candidates (47 men and 45 women; mean age, 51 yr, range, 25-72 yr) befor
e neurosurgical procedures in the sitting position.
Results: A PFO was detected in 24 of the 92 patients (26.0%) using c-TEE. c
-TCD correctly identified 22 patients, whereas c-TTE only correctly identif
ied 10. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 0.92 for c-TCD and 0.42 for c-
TTE. The negative predictive value was 0.97 for c-TCD compared with 0.83 fo
r c-TTE, The prevalence of a PFO in patients with a posterior fossa lesion
was 27%, and in the group with cervical disc herniation was 24% as detected
by c-TEE. The incidence of intraoperative venous air embolism was 35% In c
ases of cervical foraminotomy and 75% in posterior fossa surgery as detecte
d by c-TEE,
Conclusions: c-TCD is a highly sensitive and highly specific method for det
ecting a PFO, Because c-TCD is noninvasive, it may be more suitable than c-
TEE for routine preoperative screening for a PFO. C-TIE is not reliable in
detecting a PFO.