A comparison of leaf anatomy in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum and G-barbadense

Citation
Rr. Wise et al., A comparison of leaf anatomy in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum and G-barbadense, ANN BOTANY, 86(4), 2000, pp. 731-738
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
ANNALS OF BOTANY
ISSN journal
03057364 → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
731 - 738
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-7364(200010)86:4<731:ACOLAI>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Gossypium hirsutum L. (upland cotton) and G. barbadense L. (Pima cotton) ar e two of the most important fibre producing cotton species in cultivation. When grown side-by-side in the field, G. hirsutum has higher photosynthetic and transpiration rates (Lu et al., 1997. Australian Journal of Plant Phys iology 24: 693-700). The present study was undertaken to determine if the d ifferences in physiology can be explained by leaf and canopy morphology and anatomy. Scanning electron microscopy was used to compare the leaf anatomy of field-grown upland ('Delta' and 'Pine Land 50') and Pima ('S6') cotton. Compared to G. hirsutum, mature leaves of G. barbadense are larger and thi nner, with a thinner palisade layer. G. barbadense leaves show significant cupping or curling which allows for a more even absorption of insolation ov er the course of the day and much more light penetration into the canopy. A lthough G. barbadense leaves have a 70-78 % higher stomatal density on both the abaxial and the adaxial surfaces, its stomates are only one third the size of those of C. hirsutum. This results in G. barbadense having only abo ut 60 % of the stomatal surface area per leaf surface area compared to G. h irsutum. These results are indicative of the anatomical and physiological d ifferences that may limit the yield potential of G. barbadense in certain g rowing environments. (C) 2000 Annals of Botany Company.