A. Marzo et al., Comparative bioavailability of two formulations containing atenolol and chlortalidone associated in a 4 : 1 fixed combination, ARZNEI-FOR, 50(9), 2000, pp. 802-808
Atenolol (CAS 29122-68-7) and chlortalidone (CAS 77-36-1) are marketed asso
ciated in a 4:1 strength ratio (100/25 and 50/12.5 mg) for the treatment of
hypertension. According to EU guidelines, the bioequivalence of one dosage
strength call also cover additional strengths when the pharmacokinetics of
a given drug is linearly related with the dose. The kinetics of atenolol i
s linearly correlated with the dose and chlortalidone has linear kinetics w
ith doses less than or equal to 100 mg. Thus this trial carried out on the
100/25 mg strength also covers the 50/12.5 mg strength.
The trial was carried out on 18 healthy volunteers (9 males and 9 females)
according to a single dose, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence study d
esign with washout. Timed atenolol plasma concentrations and chlortalidone
blood concentrations were used to assess primary pharmacokinetic parameters
C-max, t(max) and AUC extrapolated to infinity by a non-compartmental mode
l. The bioavailability of the two formulations was compared through the 90%
confidence intervals (C.I.) of C-max and AUC in accordance with operating
guidelines. C.I. of chlortalidone were fully comprised in the 0.80-1.25 ran
ge. In the case of atenolol, which displayed a higher data dispersion, C.I.
were comprised in the enlarged 0.70-1.43 range. Time to peak, t(max), did
not show any statistically significant difference between the test and refe
rence product with respect to both analytes. Pharmacodynamic measurements o
f the decrease in systolic blood pressure led to fully overlapping results
with test and reference.
The authors conclude that the test formulation should be considered bioequi
valent with the reference with chlortalidone and in the borderline of bioeq
uivalence with atenolol. As no safety problems were involved and pharmacody
namics led to overlapping results as between test and reference, the bioequ
ivalence conclusion could be extended also to atenolol.