Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators

We studied the way in which a population of tammar wallabies (Macropus euge nii), which have been isolated from mammalian predators since the last ice age, responded to the sight and sound of historical and ontogenetically and evolutionarily novel predators. Tammars were shown a range of visual stimu li, including taxidermic mounts of two evolutionarily novel predators, a re d fox (Vulpes vulpes) and a car (Felis catus), and a model of an extinct pr edator, the thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Controls were a conspecifi c, the cart on which all mounts were presented, and blank trials in which s pontaneous change in behavior was measured. We played back recorded sounds to characterize responses to acoustic cues from predators and to a putative conspecific antipredator signal. Treatments included the howls of dingoes (Canis lupus dingo), an evolutionarily novel predator; calls of a wedge-tai led eagle (Aquila audax), a historical and current predator; and wallaby fo ot thumps. Controls were the song of an Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibic en) and a blank trial. After seeing a fox, wallabies thumped their hind fee t in alarm, suppressed foraging, and increased looking. The sight of a cat similarly suppressed foraging and increased looking. The sounds of predator s did not influence responsiveness, but wallabies foraged less and looked m ore after thump playbacks. Our results suggest that tammars respond to the sight, but not the sounds, of predators. In contrast, the response to foot thumps demonstrates that this particular sound functions as an antipredator signal. We suggest that responsiveness to visual cues has been preserved u nder relaxed selection because predator morphology is convergent, but vocal izations are not.