A. Nordmann et al., Comparison of self-reported home blood pressure measurements with automatically stored values and ambulatory blood pressure, BLOOD PRESS, 9(4), 2000, pp. 200-205
Aims: To evaluate accuracy of patient-reported home blood pressure measurem
ents (HBPM) when compared to real HBPM and their agreement with 12-h daytim
e ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Major findings: Self-reporte
d HBPM were compared to stored values of a fully automated, oscillometric b
lood pressure monitor with integrated memory device and 12-h daytime ambula
tory monitoring in 54 patients. In most patients (n = 46, 85%) mean reporte
d systolic or diastolic versus real HBPM differed by no more than 4 mmHg. I
n eight mostly uneducated patients (15%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 7-27%
) means of reported and real HBPM differed by more than 4 mmHg (range 5-28
mmHg for systolic and 0-11 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure). Systolic agr
eement between self-reported HBPM and 12-h daytime ABPM was better for pati
ents reporting greater than or equal to 80% than for patients reporting <80
% of measurements correctly (mean systolic difference 0 +/- 19 versus 5 +/-
14 mmHg, respectively), whereas the opposite was true concerning agreement
of diastolic blood pressure values (mean diastolic difference -6 +/- 10 an
d -1 +/- 9 mmHg, respectively). Conclusion: Inadequate conclusions due to p
oor reporting accuracy of HBPM are possible, especially in less educated pa
tients. Thus, ABPM or automatically stored HBPM may be preferable to self-r
eported HBPM in these patients.