Efficacy and tolerability of a combination tablet of candesartan cilexetiland hydrochlorothiazide in insufficiently controlled primary hypertension-comparison with a combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide
Kp. Ohman et al., Efficacy and tolerability of a combination tablet of candesartan cilexetiland hydrochlorothiazide in insufficiently controlled primary hypertension-comparison with a combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide, BLOOD PRESS, 9(4), 2000, pp. 214-220
This randomized, double-blind study compared the antihypertensive effect, s
afety and tolerability of a candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide (cand
esartan/HCT; 16/12.5 mg) combination tablet with that of a losartan/HCT (50
/12.5 mg) combination tablet in patients with mild-to-moderate primary hype
rtension insufficiently controlled on previous monotherapy. Men and women,
aged 20-80 years, with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater tha
n or equal to 90 and less than or equal to 110 mmHg and sitting systolic bl
ood pressure (SBP) less than or equal to 200 mmHg during treatment with any
kind of antihypertensive monotherapy for at least 4 weeks were randomized
to candesartan/HCT or losartan/HCT once daily for 12 weeks. All BP measurem
ents were performed 24 h after previous dose. Mean values and standard devi
ations (SD) or confidence intervals (CI) are given. A total of 340 patients
were enrolled, of whom 299 (144 women and 155 men, mean age 59.5 [10.5] ye
ars) were randomized to candesartan/HCT (n = 151) or losartan/HCT (n = 148)
. BPs at randomization were 159.5 (15.4)/98.4 (5.8)mmHg and 160.5 (16.1)/98
.5 (5.4) mmHg, respectively. There was a greater reduction in BP with cande
sartan/HCT than with losartan/HCT: DBP -10.4 (-11.8; -8.9) vs -7.8 (-9.3; -
6.3) mmHg, difference between treatments -2.6 (-4.7; -0.5)mmHg (p = 0.016);
SBP -19.4 (-22.1; -16.7) vs -13.7 (-16.5; -10.9) mmHg, difference between
treatments -5.7 (-9.6; -1.8)mmHg (p = 0.004). The proportion of patients ac
hieving a DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg was greater in the candesartan/
HCT group: 60.9 (53.1; 68.7) vs 49.3 (41.3; 57.4)% (p = 0.044). There were
12 withdrawals in the candesartan/HCT group, of which 8 were due to adverse
events, and 17 and 12, respectively in the losartan/HCT group. We conclude
that the combination of candesartan and HCT reduces BP effectively and is
well tolerated. BP was normalized in 61% of these patients who had insuffic
ient response to previous monotherapy. The reduction in BP and the proporti
on of patients with normalized BP were greater with the candesartan/HCT 16/
12.5 mg combination than with the losartan/HCT 50/12.5 mg combination.