Dental post-operative sensitivity associated with a gallium-based restorative material

Citation
Sm. Dunne et R. Abraham, Dental post-operative sensitivity associated with a gallium-based restorative material, BR DENT J, 189(6), 2000, pp. 310-313
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00070610 → ACNP
Volume
189
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
310 - 313
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0610(20000923)189:6<310:DPSAWA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Introduction This study forms part of a 2-year longitudinal clinical trial to compare the performance of a gallium-based restorative material (Galloy) with a high copper, mercury based (Dispersalloy) control material. Method Following Ethical Committee approval, 25 galley restorations and 25 Dispersalloy controls were placed in 14 adult patients, by a single operato r. The cavities were of moderate size, indicating the use of amalgam as the restorative material. All restorations were polished within 1 week of plac ement, photographed and a silicone impression of the tooth and restoration recorded. In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS), indicating the extent of any post-operative sensitivity, was completed by each patient for each restoration, immediately prior to polishing. A score of 0 indicated no sens itivity, while a score of 10 indicated the greatest possible sensitivity. A t B-month recall, the VAS scores, silicone impressions and photographs were repeated. Results The mean sensitivity scores for the galley and Dispersalloy restora tions at 1 week were 5.1 (+/-3.4) and 1.0 (+/-1.5), respectively and at 6 m onths, 1.8 (+/-3.0) and 0.2 (+/-0.1) respectively. The differences between these means at 1 week and at 6 months were significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion Galley restorations were associated with a much greater severity of post-operative sensitivity than Dispersalloy restorations.