Possible systemic effects of general anesthetic agents on neural informatio
n processing are discussed in the context of the thalamocortical suppressio
n hypothesis presented by Drs. Alkire, Haier, and Fallen (this issue) in th
eir PET study of the anesthetized state. Accounts of the neural requisites
of consciousness fail into two broad categories. Neuronal-specificity theor
ies postulate that activity in particular neural populations is sufficient
for conscious awareness, while process-coherence theories postulate that pa
rticular organizations of neural activity are sufficient. Accounts of anest
hetic narcosis, on the other hand, explain losses of consciousness in terms
of neural signal-suppressions, transmission blocks, and the disruptions of
signal interpretation. While signal-suppression may account for the action
s of some anesthetic agents, the existence of anesthetics, such as choralos
e, that cause both loss of consciousness and elevated discharge rates, is p
roblematic for a general theory of narcosis that is based purely on signal
suppression and transmission-block. However, anesthetic agents also alter r
elative firing rates and temporal discharge patterns that may disrupt the c
oherence of neural signals and the functioning of the neural networks that
interpret them. It is difficult at present, solely on the basis of regional
brain metabolic rates, to test process-coherence hypotheses regarding orga
nizational requisites for conscious awareness. While these pioneering PET s
tudies have great merit as panoramic windows of mind-brain con-elates, wide
r ranges of theory and empirical evidence need to be brought into the formu
lation of truly comprehensive theories of consciousness and anesthesia. (C)
2000 Academic Press.