In situ bioassays are becoming very popular for laboratory test validation
and field extrapolation. Natural conditions, including environmental variab
les, affect the "behavior" of contaminants and, consequently, their toxicit
y. This work aimed to develop protocols for in situ chronic bioassays with
cladocerans and to assess the ecological relevance of conventional protocol
s for laboratory testing (water-column and sediment). An aquatic system imp
acted with acid mine drainage was chosen for the study. At some stations th
at were contaminated with heavy metals, water-column bioassays did not reve
al any toxicity, while sediment and, especially in situ bioassays, revealed
a delay in reproduction and a reduction in fertility. Thus, both laborator
y bioassays underestimated the actual toxicity of studied sites: sediment,
besides being an important contaminant source, became significantly altered
with sampling, transport, storage, and manipulation. Therefore, an extra c
aution is needed when interpreting laboratory results, since the extrapolat
ion to natural systems could be a very problematic step. (C) 2000 Academic
Press.