In this paper I seek to make a contribution to 'geographies of mobility' by
arguing that assumptions of unrestricted movement and mobility in contempo
rary Western societies are hegemonic in prioritising specific bodies and mo
des of mobility and movement. In particular, mobility and movement are defi
ned through 'normalising' discourses which serve to alienate impaired bodie
s and to prioritise what one might term the 'mobile body: This has the effe
ct of (re)producing structured inequalities in peoples' movement and mobili
ty patterns. Such ideas are developed and illustrated with reference to int
erviews with disabled people.