Cf. Estill et al., Use of accelerometers as an ergonomic assessment method for arm acceleration - a large-scale field trial, ERGONOMICS, 43(9), 2000, pp. 1430-1445
Ergonomists need easy-to-use, quantitative job evaluation methods to assess
risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders in
field-based epidemiology studies. One device that may provide an objective
measure of exposure to arm acceleration is a wrist-worn accelerometer or a
ctivity monitor. A field trial was conducted to evaluate the performance of
a single-axis accelerometer using an industrial population (n = 158) known
to have diverse upper limb motion characteristics. The second phase of the
field trial involved an examination of the relationship between more tradi
tional observation-based ergonomic exposure measures and the monitor output
among a group of assembly-line production employees (n = 48) performing wo
rk tasks with highly stereotypic upper limb motion patterns. As expected, t
he linear acceleration data obtained from the activity monitor showed stati
stically significant differences between three occupational groups known ob
servationally to have different upper limb motion requirements. Among the a
ssembly-line production employees who performed different short-cycle assem
bly work tasks, statistically significant differences were also observed. S
everal observation-based ergonomic exposure measures were found to explain
differences in the acceleration measure among the production employees who
performed different jobs: hand and arm motion speed, use of the hand as a h
ammer, and, negatively, resisting forearm rotation from the torque of a pow
er tool. The activity monitors were found to be easy to use and non-intrusi
ve, and to be able to distinguish arm acceleration among groups with divers
e upper limb motion characteristics as well as between different assembly j
ob tasks where arm monitors were performed repeatedly at a fixed rate.