Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat

Citation
Al. Adkin et al., Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat, GAIT POSTUR, 12(2), 2000, pp. 87-93
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
GAIT & POSTURE
ISSN journal
09666362 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
87 - 93
Database
ISI
SICI code
0966-6362(200010)12:2<87:PCISTL>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
This study investigated control of posture when standing at different surfa ce heights above ground level. Alterations in surface height were used to m odify threat to postural control. Sixty-two healthy adults (mean +/- S.D. = 20.3 + 1.3 years) stood quietly on a force plate 40 cm (LOW threat), 100 c m (MEDIUM threat) or 160 cm (HIGH threat) above ground level. Each standing trial was performed with eyes open for 120 s. Postural threat was presente d in ascending (n = 31) or descending (n = 31) order with the first threat condition in each series (LOW threat for ascending group, HIGH threat for d escending group) repeated. This manipulation allowed for an examination of set effects (i.e. prior experience of postural threat) on postural control. The results demonstrated scaling of postural control variables to level of postural threat. Amplitude of centre of pressure (COP) displacement decrea sed and frequency of COP displacement increased linearly as postural threat increased from LOW to HIGH. The central nervous system progressively tight ened control of posture as postural threat increased. Initial exposure to t he HIGH or LOW threat condition influenced postural control differently. Th e group who received the HIGH threat condition first (descending) demonstra ted increased amplitude of COP displacement in the anterior-posterior direc tion compared with the group who received the LOW threat condition first (a scending). A 'first trial' effect was observed when standing for two consec utive trials but only at the LOW threat condition. Decreased amplitude and increased frequency of COP displacement were observed on the first trial co mpared to the second trial. The results of this study demonstrated that con trol of posture is influenced not only by the threat to posture but also by the order in which the threat to posture is experienced. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.