Background-With the increasing use of quality of life measures in evaluatio
ns of cardiac interventions, criteria are needed for selecting appropriate
quality of life measures. An important criterion is the sensitivity of a me
asure for detecting clinically important changes.
Objectives-To compare the sensitivity of four measures when used in a group
of cardiac patients undergoing the same intervention.,Methods-The short fo
rm 36 (SF-36), the quality of life index-cardiac version (QLI), the quality
of life after myocardial infarction questionnaire (QLMI), and the schedule
for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQoL) were used to eva
luate quality of life in a group of 22 patients after myocardial infarction
or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), at the beginning of rehabilitation
and six weeks later. Analysable data were obtained from 16 patients.
Results-A significant improvement over time was only observed for the SF-36
subscale, vitality (p < 0.05). Five of the eight SF-36 subscales and one o
f the four QLMI subscales showed modest sensitivity (index: > 0.2 and < 0.5
), while all other subscales showed poor sensitivity tinder: < 0.2). Using
SEIQoL, family was most often nominated as an area of importance to quality
of life (n = 13), followed by health (n = 10), leisure/hobbies (n = 8), ma
rriage tn = 8), and work (n = 6).
Conclusions-All four QOL measures used in this study were found to lack sen
sitivity to change. Further research is needed using other cardiac populati
ons and interventions in order to verify these findings, with a view to dev
eloping more sensitive quality of life scales.