Hierarchy

Authors
Citation
Ph. Rubin, Hierarchy, HUM NATURE, 11(3), 2000, pp. 259-279
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE
ISSN journal
10456767 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
259 - 279
Database
ISI
SICI code
1045-6767(2000)11:3<259:H>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Dominance hierarchies (sometimes called "pecking orders") are virtually uni versal in social species, including humans. In most species and in ancestra l and early human societies, these hierarchies allocate scarce resources, i ncluding food and often access to females. Humans sometimes use hierarchies for these allocational purposes, but humans use hierarchies for productive purposes as well-as in firms, universities, and governments. Productive hi erarchies and dominance hierarchies share many features. As a result, peopl e, including students of human behavior, often confuse types of hierarchies . For example, the Communist Manifesto attributes features to productive hi erarchies that are actually characteristic of dominance hierarchies. Govern ment hierarchies are particularly confusing, as they have many features of both types. In modern societies with socially mandated monogamy and volunta ry attachment to hierarchies in the form of competitive labor markets, prod uctive hierarchies are generally useful for all members, and it is importan t not to confuse the two types, either in policy or in scientific analysis.