Quantitative evaluation of techniques for ocular artefact filtering of EEGwaveforms

Citation
L. Vigon et al., Quantitative evaluation of techniques for ocular artefact filtering of EEGwaveforms, IEE P-SCI M, 147(5), 2000, pp. 219-228
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Eletrical & Eletronics Engineeing
Journal title
IEE PROCEEDINGS-SCIENCE MEASUREMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
13502344 → ACNP
Volume
147
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
219 - 228
Database
ISI
SICI code
1350-2344(200009)147:5<219:QEOTFO>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The electrical dipoles of eyes change by eye movements and blinks, producin g a signal known as an electrooculogram (EOG). A fraction of EOGs contamina te the electrical activity of the blain (electroencephalogram, EEG). Ocular artefact (OA) is a collective term used to represent EEG contaminating pot entials caused by eye movements and blinks. A procedure for quantifying the effectiveness of an algorithm for removing OA from the EEG was devised. Th is enabled the similarity between the EEG waveforms before contamination by OA and the contaminated EEG waveforms following their processing by an OA removal method to be measured. Four methods for OA removal were included in the study: extended independent component analysis (ICA)? joint approximat ion diagonalisation of eigenmatrices (JADE), principal component analysis ( PCA) and EOG subtraction. The operation of JADE and ICA is subject to ampli tude scaring and channel permutation. Procedures were incorporated to estim ate the amplitude of the recovered EEG waveforms and to allocate them to th e correct channels. It was demonstrated that the signal separation techniqu es of JADE and extended ICA were more effective than EOG subtraction and PC A for removing OA from the EEG. EOG subtraction was shown to cause attenuat ion of the recovered EEG waveforms. The effect of additive Gaussian noise o n the performance of the four OA removal methods was also investigated This indicated that the performance of the methods was unaffected by an additiv e Gaussian noise source, as long as the signal-to-noise ratio remained abov e 50.