J. Leigh et al., In vivo genotoxicity of crystalline silica as evidenced by micronuclei in pulmonary alveolar macrophages: Low-dose study, INHAL TOXIC, 12, 2000, pp. 199-204
We have previously published results showing time-course data (Leigh et ai.
, 1998) and a dose-response relationship between macrophage micronucleus fo
rmation and crystalline silica dose in intratracheally instilled rats at 2.
5, 7.5, and 22.5 mg dosage, without an inert dust control (Wang et al., 199
7). We here extend this study to low dose (0.025, 0.25, and 2.5 mg crystall
ine silica) with 2.5 mg TiO2 control. Specific-pathogen-free male Wistar ra
ts rr ere intratracheally instilled with 0.5 mi saline, and 0.025 mg, 0.25
mg, or 2.5 mg crystalline silica (Min-U-Sii 5) and 2.5 mg TiO2 suspended in
0.5 mi saline (5 rats in each group). Five days after instillation, rats w
ere sacrificed and 10 mi of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid was obtained. A
100-mu 1 volume was placed on slides by Cytospin centrifugation, stained w
ith Diif-Quik, and 1000 macrophages were scored for micronuclei (defined by
diameter < half main nucleus: same staining; round shape and complete sepa
ration). Micronucleus incidence was significantly elevated (p < .0) at the
lowest crystalline silica dose compared with saline control. There was a do
se-response relationship with crystalline silica exposure. Numbers (mean +/
- SEMI of micronucleated macrophages per 1000 macrophages scored were 1.5 /- 0.5 (saline), 3.3 +/- 0.3 (0.025 mg crystalline silica), 7.1 +/- 0.4 (0.
25 mg crystalline silica), 10.1 +/- 0.3 (2.5 mg crystalline silica), and 0.
9 +/- 0.3 (2.5 mg TiO2). We conclude that intratracheal instillation of low
doses of crystalline silica can induce micronucleus formation in alveolar
macrophages in a dose-related manner. We further believe that this is not a
nonspecific effect, consistent with crystalline silica being a genotoxic c
arcinogen.