Rb. Moreland, Pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction: the contributions of trabecular structure to function and the role of functional antagonism, INT J IMPOT, 12, 2000, pp. S39-S46
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is estimated to impact more than 150 million men
this year worldwide, An understanding of the pathophysiology of ED both fur
thers the basic scientific knowledge of disease processes and provides a ra
tional design of pharmacotherapy, At present, there are two major views reg
arding the pathophysiology of ED. In the first hypothesis, the oxygen tensi
on-dependent changes in the penis during erection are proposed to impact co
rpus cavernosum structure by inducing various cytokines, vasoactive factors
and growth factors at the two different oxygen tensions (flaccidity and er
ection) which, in turn, alter smooth muscle metabolism and connective tissu
e synthesis. Decreases in the corpus cavernosum smooth muscle/connective ti
ssue ratio have been correlated with an increased likelihood of diffuse Ven
ous leak and a failure of the veno-occlusive mechanism in prospective patie
nt studies. Evidence for such a hypothesis incorporates nocturnal penile tu
mescence and circadian changes in oxygenation as important in maintaining e
rectile health. The alternate hypothesis proposes that ED is the result of
a metabolic imbalance between relaxatory and contractile processes within t
he trabecular smooth muscle such that contractile processes predominate. Ba
sed on this hypothesis, therapy can be accomplished via drugs which shift t
his balance towards vasodilatation, or by gene therapy approaches to supple
ment the deficient components favoring smooth muscle relaxation. Both of th
ese hypotheses predict a management strategy for ED that impacts pharmacoth
erapeutics. In this review of the pathophysiology of ED, each hypothesis wi
ll be examined and a synthesis devised incorporating both views. The future
of research in this area as well as pharmacotherapy in ED in terms of path
ophysiology is discussed including the merits and drawbacks of prophylaxis
and prevention of ED.