Over the last decade there has been a proliferation in clinical trials to t
est agents for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Many aspects of
clinical trials design and conduct and guidelines for future conduct have b
een the subject of a recent comprehensive review (Rosen R et al. In: Procee
dings of the 1st International Consultation on Erectile Dysfunction 1999).
The present article attempts to extend that analysis from trials that focus
purely on symptomatic improvement of ED to trials relevant to the manageme
nt of the ED patient in the community. Although the regulatory approval pro
cess accounts for the bulk of the clinical trials undertaken, studies are a
lso initiated for concept testing, post-marketing surveillance and for prom
otional and/or pricing reasons. The trial design can be dependent on which
of the above objectives is being served. However, there are also many commo
n features that are summarized below; the major focus is placed on regulato
ry-standard or 'pivotal' studies.