Findings from a study of 27 victims of the Oklahoma City bombing are report
ed. This research focused on the importance of subjective appraisals of cop
ing self-efficacy in predicting psychological distress following this trage
dy. Results supported the hypothesis that judgments of coping self-efficacy
taken 2 months after the bombing added significantly to the explanation of
general and trauma-related distress after controlling for income, social s
upport, threat of death, and loss of resources. Coping self-efficacy judgme
nts taken 1 year later were also important in explaining psychological dist
ress after controlling for loss of resources and social-support perceptions
. Although coping self-efficacy perceptions taken at 2 months were related
to distress levels 1 year later, they did not remain significant in a regre
ssion analysis controlling for loss of resources and income. Implications o
f these findings for post-terrorist bombing interventions are discussed.