The plans that adolescent boys and girls make about participating in senior
mathematics courses and mathematics-related careers are often at odds with
their actual mathematics achievements. In contrast to explanations relatin
g plans to gender differences in mathematics performance, mathematics parti
cipation can be explained by expectancy-value models of academic choice, ba
sed on gendered self-perceptions, task perceptions, and value judgments. Th
is study with Year 10 Australian students (N = 199) added to an expectancy-
value model the students' current course levels that act as salient social
categories. The results suggest that intervention programs need to target p
erceptions by girls and boys about mathematical talent, as well as making m
athematics more useful and interesting to young adults. The findings raise
further questions about the stratification of students into separate mathem
atics courses during the early years of high school.