Use of a three-factor interpretive optimisation strategy in the development of an isocratic chromatographic procedure for the screening of diuretics in urine samples using micellar mobile phases

Citation
S. Carda-broch et al., Use of a three-factor interpretive optimisation strategy in the development of an isocratic chromatographic procedure for the screening of diuretics in urine samples using micellar mobile phases, J CHROMAT A, 893(2), 2000, pp. 321-337
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis","Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
Volume
893
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
321 - 337
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Screening of diuretics in urine is feasible through direct injection of the samples into the chromatographic system and isocratic reversed-phase liqui d chromatography (RPLC) with micellar-organic mobile phases of sodium dodec yl sulfate (SDS) and I-propanol. The surfactant coverage of the chromatogra phic column makes the addition of organic competing amines less necessary t han in conventional aqueous-organic RPLC to achieve well-shaped peaks. Also , the range of elution strengths of micellar mobile phases required to elut e mixtures of hydrophobic and hydrophilic diuretics is smaller. This allows the isocratic separation of the diuretics within adequate analysis times. An interpretive methodology is applied to optimise the resolution of a mixt ure of 15 diuretics of diverse polarity and acid-base behaviour (althiazide , amiloride, bendroflumethiazide, benzthiazide, bumetanide, canrenoic acid, chlorthalidone, ethacrynic acid, furosemide, piretanide, probenecid, toras emide, triamterene, trichloromethiazide and xipamide), using pH and concent rations of surfactant and organic modifier in the mobile phase as separatio n factors. Twelve diuretics were resolved in 25 min using 0.055 M SDS-6.0% I-propanol at pH 3.0. The mixture of 15 diuretics was also resolved with tw o mobile phases showing complementary behaviour: 0.05 M SDS-5.6% l-propanol at pH 5.4 and 0.11 M SDS-5.4% l-propanol at pH 4.2, The results were appli ed to the analysis of urine samples with limits of detection similar to tho se usually reported for aqueous-organic RPLC, taking into account that the samples were injected without any previous treatment to separate or preconc entrate the analytes. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.