Differentiation between Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans by fattyacid methyl ester analysis using gas-liquid chromatography

Citation
H. Peltroche-llacsahuanga et al., Differentiation between Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans by fattyacid methyl ester analysis using gas-liquid chromatography, J CLIN MICR, 38(10), 2000, pp. 3696-3704
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00951137 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3696 - 3704
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-1137(200010)38:10<3696:DBCDAC>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Candida dubliniensis is often found in mixed culture with C. albicans, but its recognition is hampered as the color of its colonies in primary culture on CHROMagar Candida varies. Furthermore, definite identification of C. du bliniensis is difficult to achieve, time-consuming, and expensive, Therefor e, a method to discriminate between these two closely related yeast species by fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis using gas-liquid chromatography (Sherlock Microbial Identification System [MIS]; MIDI, Inc., Newark, Del,) was developed. Although the chromatograms of these two species revealed no obvious differences when applying FAME analysis, a new library (CADLIB) wa s successfully created using Sherlock Library Generation Software (MIDI), T he amount and frequency of FAME was analyzed using library training files ( n = 10 for each species), preferentially those comprising reference strains , For testing the performance of the CADLIB, clinical isolates genetically assigned to the respective species (C. albicans, n = 32; C, dubliniensis, n = 28) were chromatographically analyzed, For each isolate tested, MIS comp uted a similarity index (SI) indicating a hierarchy of possible strain fits . When using the newly created library CADLIB, the SIs for C. albicans and C, dubliniensis ranged From 0,11 to 0.96 and 0.53 to 0.93 (for all but one) , respectively, Only three isolates of C, albicans (9.4%) were misidentifie d as C. dubliniensis, whereas all isolates of C. dubliniensis were correctl y identified. Resulting differentiation accuracy was 90.6% for C, albicans and 100% for C. dubliniensis. Cluster analysis and principal component anal ysis of the resulting FAME profiles showed two clearly distinguishable clus ters matching up with two assigned species for the strains tested, Thus, th e created library proved to be well suited to discriminate between these tw o species.