Pretreatment nomogram for predicting the outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer

Citation
Mw. Kattan et al., Pretreatment nomogram for predicting the outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer, J CL ONCOL, 18(19), 2000, pp. 3352-3359
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
0732183X → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
19
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3352 - 3359
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-183X(20001001)18:19<3352:PNFPTO>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Purpose: Several studies have defined risk groups for predicting the outcom e after external-beam radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. However, m ost models formed patient risk groups, and none of these models considers r adiation dose as a predictor variable. The purpose of this study was to dev elop a nomogram to improve the accuracy of predicting outcome after three-d imensional conformal radiotherapy. Materials and Methods:This study was a retrospective, nonrandomized analysi s of patients treated at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1988 and 1998, Clinical parameters of the 1,042 patients included stage, b iopsy Gleason score, pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) lev el, whether neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was administered, and the radiation dose delivered. Biochemical (PSA) treatment failure was score d when three consecutive rises of serum PSA occurred. A nomogram, which pre dicts the probability of remaining free from biochemical recurrence for 5 y ears, was validated internally on this data set using ct bootstrapping meth od and externally using a cohort of patients treated at the Cleveland Clini c, Cleveland, OH. Results: When predicting outcomes for patients in the validation data set f rom the Cleveland Clinic, the nomogram had ct Somers' D rank correlation be tween predicted and observed failure times of 0.52. Predictions from this n omogram were more accurate (P <.0001) than the best of seven published risk stratification systems, which achieved a Somers' D coefficient of 0.47, Conclusion: The development process illustrated here produced a nomogram th at seems to predict more accurately than other available systems and may be useful for treatment selection by both physicians and patients. J Clin Onc ol 18:3352-3359. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.