A comparison has been carried out between one mineral based hydraulic
oil and three environmentally adapted hydraulic oils. Two of these are
semi-synthetic oils, i.e. mixtures of vegetable base oil and syntheti
c esters, and the last is based on synthetic esters only. Technical pr
operties such as viscosity, pour point etc., and chemical properties s
uch as phosphorus and sulphur content etc. were documented using stand
ard test methods. The lubricant capability properties were determined
through measurements of the capability of each oil to build a film in
an elastohydrodynamic contact. The oil film thickness is important to
avoid wear and failure and to guarantee separation of surfaces. The re
sults show that at 40 degrees C the environmentally adapted oils give
a thicker film than the mineral oil. At 80 degrees C there is no signi
ficant difference between the different types of oil in their capabili
ty to build a lubricating film. The maximum shear strength was measure
d and these results are presented with the constant of proportionality
gamma, from the theoretical model tau approximate to gamma p. which i
s valid at very high pressures. The measurements were carried out at c
ontact pressures in the range 5-7 GPa. The results show that all envir
onmentally adapted oils give a lower gamma value than the mineral oil,
which is an advantage since a low shear strength results in lower fri
ction in highly loaded contacts. Measurements of toxicity to aquatic o
rganisms (Daphnia magna) show very large differences between the teste
d oils, and this implies that a change from a mineral oil to an enviro
nmentally adapted oil can give important environmental advantages. (C)
1997 Elsevier Science S.A.