Y. Zhu et al., Do cerebral potentials to magnetic stimulation of paraspinal muscles reflect changes in palpable muscle spasm, low back pain, and activity scores?, J MANIP PHY, 23(7), 2000, pp. 458-464
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS
Objective: Previous studies have shown that cortical-evoked potentials on m
agnetic stimulation of muscles are influenced by muscle contraction, vibrat
ion, and muscle spasm. This study was carried out to determine whether thes
e potentials correlate with palpatory muscle spasm,patient symptoms, and di
sability in patients with low back pain.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed on 13 subjects wit
h a history of low back pain visiting an orthopedic hospital-based clinic.
Patients were screened for serious pathologic conditions by an orthopedic s
urgeon. The patients were then evaluated for the presence of muscle spasm b
y one of the investigators who was blinded to the results of the evoked pot
ential studies. Patients were asked to complete a low back pain visual anal
ogue scale (VAS) and a Roland-Morris Activity Scale (RMAS). Cortical-evoked
potentials were recorded with a magnetic stimulator placed over the lumbar
paraspinal muscles with the patient in the prone position. The palpatory e
xamination, VAS, RMAS, and the cortical potentials were repeated after 2 we
eks of therapy commonly used to reduce muscle spasm.
Results: The patients demonstrated a significant decrease in low back pain
VAS and RMAS scores after treatment compared with before treatment. There w
as a reduction in the amount of palpatory muscle spasm in 11 of 13 cases. T
he cortical potentials before treatment were attenuated compared with previ
ously reported controls and showed a significant increase before and after
treatment in the amplitude of these potentials with multivariate analysis o
f variance. There was significant correlation between the changes in cortic
al potentials after treatment and the changes noted in paraspinal muscle sp
asm and VAS and RMAS scores.
Conclusions: This study confirms the previous report that the amplitude of
cerebral-evoked potentials on magnetic stimulation of paraspinal muscles is
depressed in the presence of palpable muscle spasm. The close correlation
among these potentials, paraspinal muscle spasm, and clinical symptoms sugg
ests that the measurement of muscle activity may be more important in the a
ssessment of low back pain than is commonly accepted.