Trigeminohypothalamic and reticulohypothalamic tract neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord and caudal medulla of the rat

Citation
A. Malick et al., Trigeminohypothalamic and reticulohypothalamic tract neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord and caudal medulla of the rat, J NEUROPHYS, 84(4), 2000, pp. 2078-2112
Citations number
195
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00223077 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2078 - 2112
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3077(200010)84:4<2078:TARTNI>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Sensory information that arises in orofacial organs facilitates exploratory , ingestive, and defensive behaviors that are essential to overall fitness and survival. Because the hypothalamus plays an important role in the execu tion of these behaviors, sensory signals conveyed by the trigeminal nerve m ust be available to this brain structure. Recent anatomical studies have sh own that a large number of neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord and ca udal medulla project directly to the hypothalamus. The goal of the present study was to identify the types of information that these neurons carry to the hypothalamus and to map the route of their ascending axonal projections . Single-unit recording and antidromic microstimulation techniques were use d to identify 81 hypothalamic-projecting neurons in the caudal medulla and upper cervical (C-1) spinal cord that exhibited trigeminal receptive fields . Of the 72 neurons whose locations were identified, 54 were in laminae I-V of the dorsal horn at the level of C-1 (n = 22) or nucleus caudalis (Vc, n = 32) and were considered trigeminohypothalamic tract (THT) neurons becaus e these regions are within the main projection territory of trigeminal prim ary afferent fibers. The remaining 18 neurons were in the adjacent lateral reticular formation (LRF) and were considered reticulohypothalamic tract (R HT) neurons. The receptive fields of THT neurons were restricted to the inn ervation territory of the trigeminal nerve and included the tongue and lips , cornea, intracranial dura, and vibrissae. Based on their responses to mec hanical stimulation of cutaneous or intraoral receptive fields, the majorit y of THT neurons were classified as nociceptive (38% high-threshold, HT, 42 % wide-dynamic-range, WDR), but in comparison to the spinohypothalamic trac t (SHT), a relatively high percentage of low-threshold (LT) neurons were al so found (20%). Responses to thermal stimuli were found more commonly in WD R than in HT neurons: 75% of HT and 93% of WDR neurons responded to heat, w hile 16% of HT and 54% of WDR neurons responded to cold. These neurons resp onded primarily to noxious intensities of thermal stimulation. In contrast, all LT neurons responded to innocuous and noxious intensities of both heat and cold stimuli, a phenomenon that has not been described for other popul ations of mechanoreceptive LT neurons at spinal or trigeminal levels. In co ntrast to THT neurons, RHT neurons exhibited large and complex receptive fi elds, which extended over both orofacial ("trigeminal") and extracephalic ( "non-trigeminal") skin areas. Their responses to stimulation of trigeminal receptive fields were greater than their responses to stimulation of non-tr igeminal receptive fields, and their responses to innocuous stimuli were in duced only when applied to trigeminal receptive fields. As described for SH T axons, the axons of THT and RHT neurons ascended through the contralatera l brain stem to the supraoptic decussation (SOD) in the lateral hypothalamu s; 57% of them then crossed the midline to reach the ipsilateral hypothalam us. Collateral projections were found in the superior colliculus, substanti a nigra, red nucleus, anterior pretectal nucleus, and in the lateral, perif ornical, dorsomedial, suprachiasmatic, and supraoptic hypothalamic nuclei. Additional projections (which have not been described previously for SHT ne urons) were found rostral to the hypothalamus in the caudate-putamen, globu s pallidus, and substantia innominata. The findings that nonnociceptive signals reach the hypothalamus primarily t hrough the direct THT route, whereas nociceptive signals reach the hypothal amus through both the direct THT and the indirect RHT routes suggest that h ighly prioritized painful signals are transferred in parallel channels to e nsure that this critical information reaches the hypothalamus, a brain area that regulates homeostasis and other humoral responses required for the su rvival of the organism.